Role of Lobbyists in Decision Making Process

In decision making by the Congress, there is a belief that lobbyists play a significant role in influencing the decisions that are to be passed out. Their diverse roles capacitate the ability of the lobbyists to influence decisions; they fulfill a role of providing solutions to citizens or public problems, the formation of the coalition on behalf of clients, control the agendas of the legislators and establishment of study power and relationships. Due to the requirement that they have to experts in their fields, they have to, therefore, provide a comprehensive and knowledgeable analysis of the relationships (Griffins). The ability of the lobbyists to influence decisions is capacitated through two main dimensions; the staffs and the members. To the members they provide background knowledge on the issues at hand. In this case, lobbyist’s analysis and knowledge on the issues to the staff is quite important. For the lobbyists influence to be successful, they have to have a skilled capability to know which policy arguments are worth convincing.

Role of Lobbyists in Decision Making Process

Lobbying should be pursued through integrity and transparency. If the lobbyist’s reports and suggestions are comprehensive and valuable, then the acquired decisions are at the potential to improve the government decisions. The primary objective behind the need for better management and appropriate decisions on public welfare, it is aggravated by the desire for transparency. Lobbyist holds the community interest at heart. Therefore, opaque activities may result in infringing policies. For instance, in the case of financial and economic crisis, quick and short term decisions have to be implemented. In this context, if the rationality is not critical, then it would mean that the implemented decisions may negatively or intensely affect the community. It is for this reason the lobbyists are valuable assets that will help intervene for the community so that they can influence the decision-making to be more rational.

Role of Lobbyists in Decision Making Process

Lobbyists play a significant role in government amendment of policies. However, they become insignificant if their impact is malicious and bribing of government leaders and decision making with money, then it would mean that their success is in jeopardy. Additionally, since they have a greater level of influence than the local citizens, the interests of the citizens are thus represented due to the limitation of lack of control (Drutman). The government is thus more responsive to the needs of the lobbyists and the wealthy citizens. The decision making is that the rich man needs and desires are in line with those of an average person. The premise is vague, and therefore the needs of the majority average citizens are not represented. In this context, the government will be better without the lobbyist because it will create a loophole for the residents’ views to be expressed.

Factors that Distinguish a Well and Poorly Run Government

Every government has to analyze on its capacity to run successfully or fail. In the assessment of finance management, many leadership States are probed with the challenge of embezzlement of funds. The weighing scale elements that distinguish the success are public debt, government spending, a nation’s level of economic growth and related macroeconomic variables. On the context of public debt, a government that has poor finance management will translate the country’s budgets into massive public debts. Projects that are run through debt they limit the economic growth of a country because they have an attached interest rate which payable by the citizens through taxation.

Role of Lobbyists in Decision Making Process

Many of developing and developed countries are faced with the challenge of finance management. Consequently, inflations are quite common. A country with an inferior currency would translate to rise in the price of goods and services. As a result, the cost of living increase and thus the poverty levels of the nation will continue to grow. Additionally, it creates an incentive for investors to shy away because the return to scale is not quite promising (Mall). On the contrary, a nation with a strong currency is suitable for investment as it has high consumer demand and thus high return to scale. Despite inflation, improper funds management would provoke economic recessions in the nation. The Economic downturn is associated with increased price of goods and services, low employment levels, high taxations and therefore limited growth.

Attributes of efficient and desirable management of a nations’ fund by the government is characterized by the following; the budget deficits are minimal as they always operate on a balanced budget. Secondly, debts and borrowing rates are at a reasonable price. If both internal and external borrowing is exceeded beyond limit, it inhibits the rate at which a nation will grow and therefore
In summation of it all, a government should establish an effective strategy for funds management. Otherwise, its success will be at stake. Finance Act as the central economic pillar of society. Since it is a scarce resource, it utilization should result in a capacity that yields the most productive and desirable results. Furthermore, it influences many variables that affect important living standards elements of citizens about; education, health, employment, living standards and related life welfare which are essential. Since it is in every citizen’s expectations to see results, especially in economic development projects like infrastructure, the government should adjust their finance management to reliable and citizens’ welfare oriented. The success of economic growth can only be achieved with appropriate funds management.

Role of Lobbyists in Decision Making Process

Integrity bears to valuable reputation rather than an appealing outside image. A good reputation helps the leaders remain outstanding even in the conquest times of storms. However, an attractive image only lasts for a short while and when the challenges of leadership hit the real character and image of the leader are portrayed (Mendes). Most importantly, with integrity, there are no shortcuts to success or pursuing projects. Shortcuts can be very disastrous and cause undesirable shortcomings. To develop a great process, it is a gradual process that takes place in our daily activities. A fortune is never built in a single day rather through regular investment. Furthermore, leadership with integrity helps the leader to be credible. Integrity is not won on a single night achievement, but it is a solid performance won. Among the American leaders that have shown integrity are George Washington and Abraham Lincoln. The fact integrity has fallen off leadership has to be aligned.

Works Cited

Drutman, Lee. “What we Get Wrong About Lobbying and Corruption.” The Washington Post (2015): 2-7.

Griffins, Micheal. “Lobbying: Influencing Decision Making with Transparency and Integrity.” CleanGovBiz (2012): 22-79.

Mall, Pall. Guideline for Public Financial Management Reform. London: World Bank, 2016.

Mendes, Henry G. Leadership and Importance of Integrity. Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2011.

State, U.S. Department of. Maintaining Government Integrity: the Perspective of the U.S. Office of Government Ethics. Netherlands: Bureau of Public Affairs, 2009.